Home - CIDEL Project - Links - About this site - Contact
 
Lisbon Treaty
Preparation StageNegotiation Stage Ratification Stage

Constitution (2004)
Preparation StageNegotiation Stage Ratification Stage

Nice Treaty (2001)
Preparation StageNegotiation Stage Ratification Stage
Amsterdam Treaty (1997)
Preparation StageNegotiation Stage Ratification Stage
Maastricht Treaty (1992)
Preparation StageNegotiation Stage Ratification Stage
Single European Act (1986)
Preparation StageNegotiation Stage Ratification Stage
Treaties of Rome (1957)
Preparation StageNegotiation Stage Ratification Stage
Treaty of Paris (1951)
Preparation StageNegotiation Stage Ratification Stage
Case LawBibliography
 
 
 
Home > The Constitution > Ratification Stage > Finland
Preparation StageNegotiation StageRatification Stage

REFERENDUMS HELD ON EUROPEAN MATTERS: 2

1994: EU - Accession (Yes 57 % - No 43% - Turnout 70 %)
1994: EU - Accession of Åland Island (Yes 74 % - No 26% - Turnout 49 %)

 

CONSTITUTIONAL CONDITIONS - Constitution of Finland

Binding referendum requires implementation by constitutional amendment. Consultative referendum expressly provided.

 

ARTICLES ABOUT INTERNATIONAL TREATIES, REFERENDUM AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS

Approval of transfer of sovereignty with effect of constitutional amendment:
Majority of votes from parliament, §§ 93, 94, 95 ConstFinland.

Approval of transfer of sovereignty with effect of constitutional amendment:
Majority of 2/3 of votes from parliament, § 94 II ConstFinland. Limit for transferance is an endangerment of the fundamental democratical rights of the constitution, § 94 III ConstFinland.

Approval of constitutional amendment:
Majority of 2/3 of votes from parliament after proposed constitutional amendment was approved by majority of votes from parliament and its new-election. Only if parliament declares with a majority of 5/6 of the votes a constitutional amendment as urgent it can be realised circumventing with majority of 2/3 of the votes, § 73 ConstFinland.

Other constitutional regulations about Referendums:
Consultative referendum can be called, § 53 ConstFinland.

 

RATING AND DEBATE

Decided

Prime Minister Matti Vanhanen has ruled out the need for a referendum, saying that a referendum is not needed since the EU will not change so much under the new Constitution. However, there have been disagreement from a number of prominent Finnish politicians, including the Minister of Trade and Industry Mauri Pekkarinen as well as the Justice Minister Johannes Koskinen, who suggested a public vote should be held together with the next Finnish presidential elections in 2006. On 09.05.2005 Finnish Prime Minister Matti Vanhanen said that the Constitution is "too complicated" to be decided by a referendum, he said that while the treaty was "not easy to read and understand", it was however "more understandable than the old treaties." Different opinion polls showed Finns in favour of the treaty. Nevertheless a poll conducted by the Taloustutkimus institute and published on 09.05.05 showed that 20 per cent of Finns would not take part in the vote and 43 per cent of Finns, said they did not know how they would vote if a referendum was called.

After European leaders extended the ratification deadline, Finnish Prime Minister Matti Vanhanen said that his country's parliamentary ratification, scheduled for late 2005 or early 2006, was also being put on ice. Now probably only a government report will be issued on the matter to lay the foundations for a thorough debate on the constitution. Nevertheless the Finnish ratification process is to continue even though the rejection of the document in France and the Netherlands means that the treaty is unlikely to take effect in its current form.
Although Foreign Minister Erkki Tuomioja said at the end of May that even if the French vote "no", "we will continue in Finland, as I expect many other countries to do, the ratification process because I don't think we have to call crisis meetings immediately,". Finnish Prime Minister Matti Vanhanen said that his country's parliamentary ratification, scheduled for late 2005 or early 2006, was also being put on ice. Finnish President Tarja Halonen said the treaty was “the best possible result that we could achieve" to give the enlarged Union an institutional framework.
A poll published on 20 June indicated widespread opposition in Finland to the Constitution, according to the poll, commissioned by Helsingin Sanomat and conducted by Suomen Gallup, nearly half of Finns would vote against the draft treaty if a referendum was held on the issue, while about a third would vote yes.
Furthermore some critics said it could suit Finland’s purposes well, the fact that there would be no decisions made on the future of the Constitution until the second half of 2006, when Finland holds the EU Presidency.

With 125 votes to 39, the Finnish parliament approved the Constitution on 5 December 2006, despite the doubts over its future following the failed referenda in France and the Netherlands. Finnish Prime Minister Matti Vanhanen said: "My own view is that the Constitutional Treaty is a well-balanced package. Europe needs reform. That is why the Finnish government wanted to push ahead with it, at both national and EU level."

Eurobarometer (2006), The Future of Europe - Results for Finland, Special Eurobarometer 251, Fieldwork: 23/02 – 15/03 2006. (PDF)

Eurobarometer report, (February 2004): 68% rather agree, 20% rather disagree*

*Are you rather agree or rather disagree with the statement: The European Union must adopt a Constitution.

Eurobarometer report, (January 2005): 42% favourable, 24% opposed*

*Based on what you know, would you say that you are in favour of or opposed to the draft European Constitution?

Eurobarometer report, (July 2005): 47% favourable, 41% opposed*

*Based on the question, are you for or against a constitution for the European Union?

Latest News

05.12.2006 Finland ratifies EU constitution, EUobserver.com

12.05.2006 Finnish parliament starts EU Constitution ratification process, EUobserver.com

Finland's parliament on Friday voted in favour of starting the process to ratify the EU Constitution.

28.04.2006 Finland ready to ratify EU constitution, EUbusiness.com

The Finnish parliament's foreign affairs committee gave the green light on Friday for the country to ratify the European Union Constitution, perhaps even before taking over the EU presidency in July.

24.04.2006 Finns want say on EU constitution, EUobserver.com

A majority of Finns would like to have a say on the country's adoption of the EU constitution, according to a new survey.

17.06.2005 Sweden, Finland postpone ratification of EU constitution indefinitely. EUbusienss.com

26.05.2005 Finland to push ahead with EU ratification even if French vote 'no'. EUbusiness.com

09.05.2005 EU constitution 'too complicated' for referendum: Finnish PM. EUbusiness.com

27.08.2004 Finnish Social Democrats against referendum on the Constitution. EUobserver.com

16.08.2004 Finnish Prime Minister Matti Vanhanen has ruled out a referendum in his country on the new EU Constitution. EUobserver.com

 

DECLARATIONS BY THE HEADS OF STATE AND GOVERNMENT

Finland’s Prime Minister Matti Vanhanen (2006) Speech, Joint Parliamentary Meeting on the Future of Europe in Brussels. 05.12.2006 (PDF)

Prime Minister Vanhanen on a referendum on the Constitutional Treaty, Press release, 15.08.2004 (PDF)

 

PROCEDURE

vote in the national parliament

 

STATE OF THE PROCEDURE

The Finnish parliament approved the Constitution (125 Yes, 39 No)

 

DATE OF RATIFICATION

05.12.2006

 

RELEVANT DOCUMENTS AND MATERIAL

The Federal Trust, EU Constitution Newsletter, October 2004, with country reports on Spain and Finland.

 

© Carlos Closa 2003 - Design by Eduardo Jáuregui. Edited by Mario Kölling
Doctorado en Unión Europea