Home > Amsterdam Treaty

• Areiza Carvajal, J.M. de, "Enhanced cooperations in the Treaty of Amsterdam: some critical remarks", Harvard Law School, The Jean Monnet Chair, Working Papers N. 13, 1998.
• Bourlanges, J-L., La Conférence intergouvernementale ... ou comment s'en débarrasser?", Les Petites Affiches, 33, 17 March, 19-22, 1997.
• Bribosia, H., " De la Subsidiarité à la coopération renforcée ", Le Traite' d'Amsterdam: Espoirs et Déceptions, Brussels: Bruylant, 1998.
• Caporaso J. A., "The European Union and forms of state: Westphalian, Regulatory or Post-Modern?", Journal of Common Market Studies, 34 (1), 1996.
• Constantinesco, V., "Les clauses de coopération renforcée, Le protocole sur l'application des principes de subsidiarité et de proportionalité", RTD eur., 33(4), octobre-décembre, 751-67, 1997.
• Corrado, L., "L'Integration de Schengen dans l'Union Européenne: problèmes et perspectives", Mémoire Présenté pour le Diplôme d'études européennes approfondies, Bruges: Collége d'Europe, 1997-1998.
• Craig, P., "Democracy and rulemaking within the EC: an empirical and normative assessment", European Law Journal, 3, 105-30, 1997.

• Dehousse, F., "Les résultats de la Conference Intergouvernementale", Cahiers du Centre de Recherches socio-politiques N. l565-1566, 1997.
• Dehousse, F.,"Les enjeux de l'élargissement", Cahiers du CRSPP N. 1600, 1998.
• Dehousse, R., "Citizens' rights and the reform of comitology procedures: the case for a pluralist approach", Florence, The Robert Schuman Centre EUI Policy Paper 98/4, 1998.
• Dehousse, R.,"Institutional architecture after Amsterdam: parliamentary system or regulatory structure?" Common Market Law Review, 595-627, 1998.
• De Schoutheete, P., "L'avenir de I'Union: bilan et perspectives". Speech given at a seminar organized by the Institute of European Studies of Louvain-la-Neuve on 5 December, 1997.
• De Schoutheete, P.,"Closer cooperation: political background and issues in the negotiation", J. Monar and W. Wolfgang (eds), The Treaty of Amsterdam, London: Pinter, 1999.
• Den Boer, M., "Travel notes on a bumpy journey from Schengen via Maastricht to Amsterdam", M. den Boer (ed.), The Implementation of Schengen: First the Widening, Now the Deepening. Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration, 1997.
• De Kerchove, C., "Un espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice aux dimensions incertaines: Quelques réflexions sur le recours aux coopérations renforcées en matiére de justice et d'affaires intérjeures", M. den Boer, A. Guggenhühl and S. Vanhoonacker (eds), Coping with Flexibility and Legitimacy after Amsterdam, Current European Issues, Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration, 1998.
• Devuyst, Y., "Treaty reform in the European Union: the Amsterdam process", Journal of European Public Policy, 615-31, 1998.
• Devuyst, Y.,"The community method after Amsterdam", Journal of Common Market Studies, 37 (1), 1999.
• De Zwaan, J. W., "Flexibiliteit in het Verdrag van Amsterdam. Flexibiliteit en het Verdrag van Amsterdam", Asser Instituut Culloquium Europees Recht T.M.C., Asser Press, 1999.
• Díez-Hochleitner, J., "La simplificación. Objetivo prioritario de la CIG '96", Gaceta Jurídica de la CE y de la Competencia, Boletín, julio-agosto 1996, Edición EINSA, Madrid, 1996, 5-16.
• Dinan, D., "Reflections on the IGCs". In P-H. Laurent and M. Maresceau, The State of the European Union, Vol. 4: Deepening and Widening, Boulder, Co: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1998.
• Dinan, D.,"Treaty change in the European Union: the Amsterdam experience", L. Cram, D. Dinan and N. Nugent (eds), Developments in the European Union, London: Macmillan, 290-310, 1999.
• Edwards, G. and E. Philippart, "Flexibility and the Treaty of Amsterdam: Europe's New Byzantium?", University of Cambridge, Centre for European Legal Studies, Occasional Papers N. 3, November, 1997.
• Ehlermann, C. D., "Differentiation, flexibility, Closer Cooperation: The New Provisions of the Amsterdam Treaty", Florence European University Institute, 1998.
• Faramiñán Gilbert, J. M. de., "Evolución y ampliación de competencias del Tribunal de primera instancia y la Conferencia Intergubernamental de 1996", Gaceta Jurídica de la CE y de la Competencia, Serie D. D-26. Edición EINSA, Madrid, 1996, 301-366.
• Fennelly, N., "Preserving the legal coherence within the New Treaty", M. den Boer, A. Guggenhühl and S. Vanhoonacker (eds), Coping with Flexibility and Legitimacy after Amsterdam, Current European Issues, Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration, 1998.
• Flauss, J. F., "Vers un droit constitutionnel européen. Quel droil constitutionnel européen?" Revue Universelle des droits de l`homme, 357-468, 1995.
• Fligstein, N. and J. McNichol, "The institutional terrain of the European Union", W. Sandholtztz and A Stone Sweet (eds), European Integration and Supranational Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
• Fontaine, N., "Le Traité d'Amsterdam á l'intention de ceux qui aimeraient s'intéresser à l'Europe si elle était moins obscure". Centre européen d'Initiatives de Coopération. Neuilly-sur-Seine, 1998.

• Gahrton, P., "The new EU after Amsterdam", Edición Gröna Böcker, Lund, 1998.
• Gaja, G., "How flexible is flexibility under the Amsterdam Treaty?", Common Market Law Review, 35 (4), 855-70, 1998.
• Gialdino, C. C., " Schengen et le troisième pilier: le contrôle juridictionnel organisé par le traité d'Amsterdam ", Revue du Marché Unique Européen, 2, 89-123, 1998.
• Gower, J., "The European Union and the 1996 IGC. Crisis or opportunity? EU enlargement to Central and Eastern Europe", Edition Centre European Union Studies/European Commission in the United Kingdom, N. 4, England, 1996.
• Grunert, T. y Ravellec, Ch., "Parlamento Europeo. La PESC en el comienzo de la Conferencia Intergubernamental", Edición Parlamento Europeo, Dirección General de Estudios, División de Asuntos Políticos e Institucionales, Luxemburgo, 1996.
• Gutiérrez Espada, C., "El sistema institucional de la Unión Europea y la Conferencia Intergubernamental de revisión de 1996", Gaceta Jurídica de la CE y de la Competencia, Serie D. D26, Edición EINSA, Madrid, 1996, 139-246.
• Juárez Pérez, P., "De Maastricht a Ámsterdam: cinco años de ciudadanía". Edición EINSA, Gaceta Jurídica de la CE y de la Competencia, Boletín n. 129, Diciembre 1997, Madrid.
• Kortenberg, H., "La négociation du Traité d'Amsterdam: Une vue cavalière", Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Européen, 709-19, 1997.
• Kortenberg, U., "Closer cooperation in the Treaty of Amsterdam", Common Market Law Review, 35 (4), 833-54, 1998.
• Lafay, G. et Pini, J., "Du Traité d'Amsterdam", Edition Fondation Marc Bloch, Notes de la Fondation Marc Bloch, N. 1, Septémber 1998, París.
• Laffan, B., "The governance of the Union". In B. Tonra, (ed.), Amsterdam, what the Treaty Means, Dublin, 1997.
• Laso Pérez, J. J., "El Tratado de Amsterdam y el respeto de la democracia y los derechos humanos", Boletín Europeo de la Universidad de La Rioja, Núm. 2, Febrero 1998, Suplemento, 31-42.
• Laursen, F., "The lessons of Maastricht", G. Edwards and A. Pijpers, The Politics of European Treaty Reform: The 1996 Intergovernmental Conference and Beyond, London: Printer, 1997.
• Lenaerts, K., "Federalism essential concepts in evolution: the case of the European Union", Fordham International Law Journal, 746-98, 1998.
• Lodge, J., "Negotiations in the European Union: the 1996 Intergovernmental Conference", International Negotiation, 3, 481-505, 1998.
• Louis, J. V., "Le Traité d 'Amsterdam, une occasion perdue?", Revue du Marché Unique Européen, N. 2, 1997, Edition Clement Juglar, Bélgica, 1997, 5-18.

• Majone, G. D., "Europe's democratic deficit: The question of standards", European Law Journal, 5-28, 1998.
• Maltera, A. (ed.), "La Conférence intergouvernementalle sur l'Union européenne: répondre aux défis du XXI siécle", Paris: Clément Juglar, 1996.
• Mangas Martín, A. "El Tratado de Ámsterdam: aspectos generales del pilar comunitario". Edición EINSA, Gaceta Jurídica de la CE y de la Competencia, Serie D. GJ, D-29, septiembre 1998, Madrid, 7-70.
• Martínez Lage, S. "El Tratado de Ámsterdam: algunos aspectos jurídicos (I)", Gaceta Jurídica de la CE y de la Competencia, Boletín, Núm. 124, junio 1997, Edición EINSA, Madrid, 1997, 1-3.
• McDonagh, B., "Original Sin in a Brave New World: An Account of the Negotiation of the Treaty of Amsterdam", Dublin: Institute of European Affairs, 1998.
• Mekalfe, L., "Flexible integration in and after the Amsterdam Treaty", M. den Boer, A. Guggenbühl and S. Vanhoonacker (eds), Coping with Flexibility and Legitimacy after Amsterdam, Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration, 1998.
• Millard, D., "The European Union and the 1996 IGC. Crisis or opportunity?" Constitutional Issues: the European Parliament and National Parliaments, Edition Centre European Union Studies/European Commission in the United Kingdom, N. 2, England, 1996.
• Monar, J., "The European Union's Foreign Affairs system after the Treaty of Amsterdam: a strengthened capacity for external action?", European Foreign Affairs Review, 2, 413-36, 1997.
• Monar, J.,"Justice and home affairs in the Treaty of Amsterdam: reform at the price of fragmentation", European Law Review, 23, 320-35, 1998.
• Monar, J.,"Schengen and flexibility in the Treaty of Amsterdam: opportunities and risks of differentiated integration in EU Justice and Home Affairs", M. den Boer (ed.), Shengen, Judicial Cooperation and Policy Coordination, Maastricht: EIPA, 1997.
• Moravesik, A. and Kalypso N., "Explaining the Treaty of Amsterdam: interests, influence, institutions", Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(1), 59-85, 1999.
• Navarro Batista, N., "El sistema institucional en el Tratado de Ámsterdam", Boletín Europeo de la Universidad de La Rioja, N. 2, Febrero 1998, Suplemento, 17-30.
• Oreja Aguirre, M. (director), "El Tratado de Ámsterdam. Análisis y comentarios", Edición McGraw Hills, Madrid, 1998.
• Oreja Aguirre. M., "La Unión Europea: entre los pueblos y Estados una reflexión tras el final de la Conferencia Intergubernamental de 1996", Boletín Europeo de la Universidad de La Rioja, Núm. 2.
• Ortega, M. C., "Mayoría y unanimidad en el Consejo ante la CIG", Gaceta Jurídica de la CE y de la Competencia, Serie D. GJ, D-25, julio 1996, Edición EINSA, Madrid, 1996, 113-177.
• Patijn, M., "The Dutch Presidency", In The European Policy Centre, Making Sense of the Amsterdam Treaty, Brussels, 1997.
• Pernice, I. y Mayer F. C., " Multilevel Constitutionalism and the Treaty of Amsterdam: European Constitution Making Revisited?", 36 Common Market Law Review, 703, 1999.
• Petite, M., "Le traité d'Amsterdam: ambition et réalisme", Revue du March Unique Européen, 17, 1997.
• Pierson, P., "The path to European integration: a historical institutionalist analysis", Comparative Political Studies, 29 (2), 123-63, 1996.
• Preston, C., "Obstacles to EU enlargement: the classical community method and the prospects for a wider Europe", Journal of Common Market Studies, 33 (3), 453-63, 1995.

• Remiro Brotons, A. "¿Qué ha significado el Tratado de Ámsterdam para la PESC? Edición EINSA, Gaceta Jurídica de la CE y de la Competencia, Serie D. GJ, D-29, septiembre 1998, Madrid, 71-104.
• Rogers, B., "The European Union and the 1996 ICG. Crisis or opportunity?", Social Policy, Education and Training: towards social citizenship, Edition Centre European Union Studies/European Commission in the United Kingdom, N. 10, England, 1996.
• Scott, A., "The European Union and the 1996 IGC. Crisis or opportunity? Monetary Union and the IGC", Edition Centre European Union Studies/European Commission in the United Kingdom, N. 5, England, 1996.
• Shaw, J., "The Treaty of Amsterdam: challenges of flexibility and legitimacy", European Law Journal, 4 (1), 63-86, 1998.
• Snyder, F., "EMU revisited: are we making a constitution? What constitution are we making?", LIII Working Papers Law 98/6 Florence, 1998.
• Stubb, A., "Negotiating flexible integration in the Amsterdam Treaty", K. Neunreither and A. Wiener (eds.) European Integration After Amsterdam: institutional Dynamics and Prospects for Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 153-75, 2000.
• Telo, M. et Magnette, P., "De Maastricht à Amsterdam. L'Europe et son nouveau traité". Editions Complexe, Collection, Etudes européennes, Bruxelles, 1998.
• Timmermans, C. W. A., "General institutional questions: the effectiveness and simplification of decision-making". In J. A. Winter et al., (ed.), Reforming the Treaty on European Union, The Hague, 1996.
• Toulemon, R., in M. Westlake (ed ), The European Union beyond Amsterdam London: Routledge, 1998.
• Verhoeven, A., "How democratic need European Union members be? Some thoughts after Amsterdam", European Law Review, 217-34, 1998.
• Wallace, H. and de la Serre, F., "Flexibility and Enhanced Cooperation in the European Union: Placebo rather than Panacea", Paris, 1997.
• Wa1lace, H., "Politics and Policy in the EU: the Challenge of Governance". In
• H. Wallace and W. Wallace (eds), Po1icy-Making in the European Union, 3rd ed.
• Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
• Weidenfeld, W. (ed.), Amsterdam in der Analyse, Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 1998.
• Weiler, J., "The Transformation of Europe". Yale Law Journal, 100, 2403-83, 1991.
• Weiler, J., "After Maastricht: community legitimacy in post-1992 Europe". W. J. Adams (ed.), Singular Europe: Economy and Polity of the European Community after 1992, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1992.
• Weiler, J. and Wessels, W., "An ever closer fusion? a dynamic macropolitical view on integration process", Journal of Common Market Studies, 2, 267-99, 1997.
• Westlake, M. (ed.), "The European Union beyond Amsterdam", New Concept of European Integration, London, 1998.